Skip to content

Four-Axis Personality Questionnaire

Our own forced-choice questionnaire on the four public dichotomies — 24 items or an 8-item short form — scored as a strength bar per axis rather than a hard four-letter verdict.

Our own forced-choice questionnaire on the four public dichotomies — 24 items, or 8 if you want the quick version. The result is a strength bar per axis rather than a four-letter verdict, because a 4–2 split and a 6–0 split give the same letter and are not the same finding. This is not the MBTI and is not affiliated with The Myers-Briggs Company.

🔒 Runs entirely in your browserpersonalityquizquestionnairefun
For fun

For fun. This is a description of how you answered twenty-four questions today, not a diagnosis, not a measurement of ability, and not a basis for a decision about anyone — least of all in hiring.

This is not the MBTI. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and MBTI are registered trademarks of The Myers-Briggs Company; the real instrument is licensed, its items are copyrighted, and it is meant to be interpreted by someone trained to do it. What is public is the four dichotomies, which come from Jung’s *Psychologische Typen* (1921). These items are our own.

The questionnaire

Length

0 of 24 answered

  1. 1.After a long evening in a crowded room
  2. 2.At a gathering where I know almost nobody
  3. 3.When I am working something out
  4. 4.A free Saturday
  5. 5.When my phone rings unexpectedly
  6. 6.I get more work done
  7. 7.When someone explains something new
  8. 8.With an unfamiliar device
  9. 9.What I remember about a day, weeks later
  10. 10.A good idea, to me, is more often
  11. 11.I would rather read
  12. 12.When handing over a task, I lead with
  13. 13.Making a hard decision, I keep coming back to
  14. 14.When a friend tells me about a bad day
  15. 15.When I am criticised, the first thing I check is
  16. 16.Someone asks for an exception to a rule. I think first about
  17. 17.Praise means more to me when it is about
  18. 18.For a team decision I would rather have
  19. 19.For a trip
  20. 20.With a deadline two weeks out
  21. 21.Having something decided
  22. 22.My desk right now
  23. 23.When a plan changes at the last minute
  24. 24.What I have to do today is

Result

24 items left. The bars fill in as you answer.

  • Where attention goes — 외향 (E) · 내향 (I)even (0 : 0)
    E
    I

    Your answers are evenly split on this axis, which is a real answer and not a failure to answer.

  • What information is trusted — 감각 (S) · 직관 (N)even (0 : 0)
    S
    N

    Your answers are evenly split on this axis.

  • How a decision is settled — 사고 (T) · 감정 (F)even (0 : 0)
    T
    F

    Your answers are evenly split on this axis.

  • How the outside is handled — 판단 (J) · 인식 (P)even (0 : 0)
    J
    P

    Your answers are evenly split on this axis.

Four-letter shorthand

----

Shown because people ask for it, and small because it is the least informative thing on this page. Two of these letters can come from a 4–2 split and two from a 6–0 split, and the shorthand does not distinguish them. The bars do.

Four-letter typologies have weak test-retest reliability: a large minority of people are given a different letter when they take the same instrument again weeks later, and the axis that moves is almost always one that was near the middle. This page shows how near the middle each of yours is, so you can see for yourself which letters are worth anything.

Where this comes from, and what the evidence says

  • C. G. Jung, *Psychologische Typen* (1921) — the four dichotomies, and the only part of the scheme that is in the public domain. The instrument built on them is not.
  • Howes & Carskadon (1979), *Journal of Psychological Type* — one of the early test-retest studies; a substantial share of respondents changed at least one letter over five weeks.
  • Pittenger, “The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator”, *Review of Educational Research* 63(4), 1993 — a review of the reliability and validity evidence.
  • Druckman & Bjork (eds.), *In the Mind’s Eye: Enhancing Human Performance*, National Research Council, 1991 — the chapter that concluded the evidence did not support the instrument’s use in career counselling.
  • The items themselves were written for this page and are not taken from any published instrument.

If you came here from a fortune page, the 오늘의 운세 tool is the one that separates a calendar fact from what a tradition says about it.

How to use it

  1. Answer without weighing it up

    Neither option is the good one — the pairs are written as two ordinary ways of doing an ordinary thing, with no praise on either side. The first answer that feels true is the one to take.

  2. Read the bars, not the letters

    Each bar runs from the centre outward. A short bar means the axis is nearly even, which the page also says in words — an axis that close is one changed answer from the other letter.

  3. Take the short form for a quick answer

    Two items per axis. It is quicker and correspondingly rougher — with two items an axis can only come out 2–0 or 1–1 — and the page says so when you switch.

Common questions

Is this the MBTI?

No. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and MBTI are registered trademarks of The Myers-Briggs Company; the instrument is licensed, its items are copyrighted, and it is meant to be interpreted by someone trained to do it. The four dichotomies themselves come from Jung’s *Psychologische Typen* (1921) and are public. These items were written for this page.

Why is there no sixteen-type description?

Because that is the point at which a four-letter page stops describing how someone answered and starts telling a stranger who they are — and it is also the part that is unmistakably somebody else’s instrument. The page describes each axis lean instead.

How reliable is a result like this?

Not very, and the page says so with citations. Test-retest studies of four-letter typologies find a large minority of people get a different letter weeks later, and the axis that moves is almost always one that was near the middle — which is exactly what the bars show you.

Why does answering everything “A” give me no letters?

Because half the items on each axis put the first pole in option A and half put it in option B. Someone picking the first option out of habit lands dead in the middle on every axis instead of getting a confident result built entirely out of a response habit.

Should this be used for hiring?

No. Nor should the instrument it is not. The National Research Council’s 1991 review concluded the evidence did not support even the licensed instrument’s use in career counselling; a web page with twenty-four items of our own is further from that, not closer.

Feed it from

Next

These accept what this tool produces, so the result can go straight in.